> Yeah, good point. I think properly dealing with the pg_depends issues will > catch anything of that nature, but what to do with them? > > Probably should move dependent type, constraint, index entries to the same new > namespace. We might want to move related sequences, but I'm not sure we'd want > to do that silently, since the sequence could be in use for other tables as > well. And we should probably restrict the change if there are dependent > functions or views. Does this capture the issues?
Why just restrict them to moving tables? What if someone wants to move a function or an aggregate to another schema? What if they want to copy it? Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
