On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > I have been annoyed by this multiple times. I think we should make sure the > C99 defines are there (providing values if they aren't) and always use those. > We've used them in parts of the tree long enough that it's unlikely to cause > problems. Nothing is helped by using different things in other parts of the > tree.
+1 -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
