On 2015-03-23 14:19:50 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2015-03-23 13:01:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > > I'm a little confused as to the status of this patch. It's marked as > > > Waiting on Author in the CommitFest application, and the last patch > > > version was posted in December. > > > > I think it fairly can be marked as "returned with feedback" for now? > > ... which means that no useful feedback was received at all in this > round for this patch. (There was lots of feedback, mind you, but as far > as I can see it was all on the subject of how the patch is going to be > summarily rejected unless user-visible controls are offered -- and you > already know my opinion on that matter.)
To me the actual blocker seems to be the implementation. Which doesn't look like it's going to be ready for 9.5; there seems to be loads of work left to do. It's hard to provide non flame-bait feedback if the patch isn't ready. I'm not sure what review you'd like to see at this stage? I think your approach of concentrating on the technical parts is sane, and I'd continue going that way. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
