On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:43:42PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 09:53:18PM +0100, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote: > > > > On 07/11/14 22:02, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > > >Kevin Grittner wrote: > > >>>I think most people have always assumed that > > >>>BEGIN starts the transaction and that is the point at > > >>>which the snapshot is obtained. > > >>But there is so much evidence to the contrary. Not only does the > > >>*name* of the command (BEGIN or START) imply a start, but > > >>pg_stat_activity shows the connection "idle in transaction" after > > >>the command (and before a snapshot is acquired) > > >Er...I think we are arguing the same thing here. So no contrary > > >needed? :) > > > > So do we agree to fix the docs? ^_^ > > Doc patch attached.
Patch applied. Thanks for the report. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
