"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hang on - so when vacuum runs it knows exactly how many pages it cleaned up
> but if the fsm value is low, it doesn't help? Why don't we just
> automaticlaly set the FSM value to the max that vacuum has to clean
> up?
Because we can't resize shared memory on-the-fly.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
