> The simple workaround for this was adding a fallback to GEE when f[1] or f[2] is 0. GEE is another estimator described in the paper, behaving much better in those cases.
For completeness, what's the downside in just always using GEE?
> The simple workaround for this was adding a fallback to GEE when f[1] or f[2] is 0. GEE is another estimator described in the paper, behaving much better in those cases.
For completeness, what's the downside in just always using GEE?