On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:36 AM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > This example exemplifies the poorness of the proposed wording, IMO: > > > [...] > SET dname = EXCLUDED.dname || ' (formerly ' || TARGET.dname || ')' > > NEW.dname || '(formerly ' || OLD.dname || ')' reads perfectly well. > > Yes, this is an isolated example...but am I missing the fact that there is a > third tuple that needs to be referenced? > > If there are only two the choices of NEW and OLD seem to be both easily > learned and readable.
Whatever Andres and/or Heikki want is what I'll agree to. Honestly, I just don't care anymore. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
