* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote: > On the other hand it's way more convenient to specify a single > constraint name than several columns and a predicate. I'm pretty sure > there's situations where I a) rather live with a smaller chance of error > during a replacement of the constraint b) if we get concurrently > replaceable constraints the naming should be doable too. > > I don't see your argument strong enough to argue against allowing this > *as an alternative*.
Agreed.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
