On 5 Dec 2002 at 9:31, Stephan Szabo wrote:

> When we talk about ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY we're being imprecise, so
> I think that might be why we're talking past each other here.
> 
> Technically the syntax in question is:
>  ALTER TABLE <table> ADD <table constraint definition>
> where CONSTRAINT <name> is an optional leading clause in a table
> constraint definition.  ADD FOREIGN KEY is a shorthand for a foreign key
> constraint (technically unnamed).

Understood.

What about allowing a named foreign key?  I haven't checked the RFCs

> Thus you can also say things like:
> ALTER TABLE <table> ADD CONSTRAINT blah CHECK (foo!=0);
> to make a named check constraint.

Understood.
-- 
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Reply via email to