"Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You can do that now.
>> ALTER TABLE <table> ADD CONSTRAINT <const> FOREIGN KEY ....
> That I know. That syntax is radically different from that proposed.
So you're proposing we replace a SQL-spec-compliant syntax with one
that is not? Why?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
