On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:32:03AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > We also need to start thinking about what happens after feature > freeze. The CommitFest application currently lists a 2015-06 > CommitFest which, according to previous practice, would be expected to > start on the 15th of the month. Given where we are now, that seems > entirely unrealistic. I am doubtful that we will be ready to ship a > beta by mid-June, let alone begin a new development cycle.
This is a very good analysis. I have been holding back my trivial new patches for 9.6 in hopes of setting a good example. However, all my stuff is new, while many of these other patches have waited their turn for review, and we are going to be unfair to submitters if we don't give them the attention they deserve --- that is always the tension we have at this time. We have three days left so I think we need committers to devote serious time, if possible, to helping us resolve as much as we can. If we start thinking about this on Friday, it is too late. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
