On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:19:29AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:32:03AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > We also need to start thinking about what happens after feature > > freeze. The CommitFest application currently lists a 2015-06 > > CommitFest which, according to previous practice, would be expected to > > start on the 15th of the month. Given where we are now, that seems > > entirely unrealistic. I am doubtful that we will be ready to ship a > > beta by mid-June, let alone begin a new development cycle. > > This is a very good analysis. I have been holding back my trivial new > patches for 9.6 in hopes of setting a good example. However, all my > stuff is new, while many of these other patches have waited their turn > for review, and we are going to be unfair to submitters if we don't give > them the attention they deserve --- that is always the tension we have > at this time. > > We have three days left so I think we need committers to devote serious > time, if possible, to helping us resolve as much as we can. If we start > thinking about this on Friday, it is too late.
Let me put a finer point on this --- whatever gets pushed to 9.6 unreasonably will be a feature we don't have in 9.5 and will discourage future development. I know we can't do magic, but now is the time to try. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
