On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:28:33PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough > > to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't convinced > > of that yet, but time grows short, and I quite agree with Robert that > > committing almost-ready patches at this stage of the game is a bad idea.) > > I think if there's any patch that deserves some leeway it's this > one. It's been been forced into a limbo for nearly half a year; without > leaving Andrew many options. > > I've removed the use of GroupedVars and Andrew is right now working on > structural changes. I'm not ready at this point to make a judgement.
I will call for a vote that the freeze deadline be changed if this patch is rejected to due to time. I might lose the vote, but I am going to try because if we lose our reputation for fairness, we have lost a lot more than a week/month of release time. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
