On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough >> to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't convinced >> of that yet, but time grows short, and I quite agree with Robert that >> committing almost-ready patches at this stage of the game is a bad idea.) > > I think if there's any patch that deserves some leeway it's this > one. It's been been forced into a limbo for nearly half a year; without > leaving Andrew many options.
+1. If Andres is going to try and find a way of getting the patch into 9.5, then I think he deserves at least a few extra days. It wasn't as if Andrew wasn't all over this from early in the cycle. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
