On 2015-05-15 PM 02:13, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2015-05-15 3:39 GMT+02:00 Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: >> One reason for this may be that the worker was not started with the flag >> BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS which is necessary to perform InitProcess() that >> would >> initialize a PGPROC entry for it. But if you'd used the same method for >> initializing workers as test_shm_mq_setup(), then it should have. >> > > I have it >
See my other (the last) email. You said you created a bgworker from bgworker, so if the parent bgworker did not perform BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection, then it would not be found in ProcArray. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
