On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:32:23PM +0200, Volker Aßmann wrote: > That's what we are currently doing with the patch Bernd posted at the > beginning > of this thread. But we thought we might post the patch for consideration here > as the use case might be sufficiently general that it may be of use to others.
It isn't general enough. > But I like the more general approach proposed by Alvaro, so in case this patch > would have a chance to not be immediately rejected, I would try to implement > the more generic approach. I would also include a check to ensure at least one > reasonably secure way for password recovery is available. For Unix systems > "peer" authentication seems to be a good candidate. Likely to be rejected. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
