On 2015-05-20 15:37:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > > That does cover all bases, and users would be able to create the > > operator which suits their particular use case easily. It's also fairly > > similar to how jsquery works, although the syntax is completely different. > > > But ... it's after feature freeze. So, thoughts? > > I think this could be seen as a correction/bug fix for a pre-freeze > feature. We should not be too resistant to filing down rough edges > on new features, even if that involves a spec change.
+1 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
