Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-05-20 16:21:57 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > In HEAD only. Previous branches seem mostly clean, so there's something > > going wrong. Spinlocks going wrong perhaps? > > > > http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=anole&dt=2015-05-20%2016%3A30%3A26&stg=check > > ! PANIC: stuck spinlock (c00000000d6f4140) detected at lwlock.c:816 > > ! server closed the connection unexpectedly > > ! This probably means the server terminated abnormally > > ! before or while processing the request. > > ! connection to server was lost > > Hm. Anole hasn't reported reliably for a while before these. It's quite > possible that this is a ac++ portability problem around the > atomics. There's lots of other IA64 animals not having problems, but > they're not using ac++.
Lots? As far as I can tell, this is the only Itanium machine in the buildfarm. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
