On 2015-05-20 16:44:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: > > Hm. Anole hasn't reported reliably for a while before these. It's quite > > possible that this is a ac++ portability problem around the > > atomics. There's lots of other IA64 animals not having problems, but > > they're not using ac++. > > Lots? As far as I can tell, this is the only Itanium machine in the > buildfarm.
Uh. I'm pretty sure there were some back when that patch went in. And there definitely used to be a couple earlier. I guess itanium really is dying (mixed bad: It's a horrible architecture, but more coverage would still be good). -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
