Re: To Andres Freund 2015-05-24 <20150524075244.gb27...@msg.df7cb.de> > Re: Andres Freund 2015-05-24 <20150524005245.gd32...@alap3.anarazel.de> > > How about, to avoid masking actual problems, we have a more > > differentiated logic for the toplevel data directory? I think we could > > just skip all non-directory files in there data_directory itself. None > > of the files in the toplevel directory, with the exception of > > postgresql.auto.conf, will ever get written to by PG itself. And if > > there's readonly files somewhere in a subdirectory, I won't feel > > particularly bad.
pg_log/ is also admin domain. What about only recursing into well-known directories + postgresql.auto.conf? (I've also been wondering if pg_basebackup shouldn't skip pg_log, but that's a different topic...) Christoph -- c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
