On 2015-05-25 13:38:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On May 24, 2015 7:52:53 AM PDT, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > If we'd merge it with initdb's list I think I'd not be that bad. I'm > > thinking of some header declaring it, roughly like the rmgr list. > > pg_log/ is a counterexample to that idea too; initdb doesn't know about it > (and shouldn't).
The idea would be to *only* directories that initdb knows about. Since that's where the valuables are. So I don't see how pg_log would be a counterexample. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
