On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:32:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > Are we ready for a pgindent run? Back branches?
>
> I think we could do it in HEAD, but it doesn't seem like we have consensus
> about whether to touch the back branches. Suggest just HEAD for now and
> we can continue to argue about the back branches.
Here is a re-run of pgindent on 9.4:
http://momjian.us/expire/pgindent-9.4.diff
It is 5.7k line diff. I didn't do pre-9.4 because pgindent was slightly
modified before the 9.4 run, so there would be additional changes in
those back branches.
If we wanted to do this on backbranches, I think we would create a diff
file of the minor release just before running pgindent and stamping so
users could see the non-pgindent content of the release. A crazy idea
would be to release of just pgindent changes so we would not add
pgindent changes into a fix release.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
