On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:10:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Here is a re-run of pgindent on 9.4: > > http://momjian.us/expire/pgindent-9.4.diff > > Some of those diffs would disappear if you'd used an up-to-date typedefs > list ... not a lot, but some.
Uh, you mean a current 9.4.X typedef list? Should I try that? > That is rather a lot of diffs, but the thing I think people ought to take > away from that is "this is the number of back-patch hazards we just > introduced between HEAD and 9.4" --- because as of yesterday, HEAD looks > like this not like what's in 9.4. What's more, those hazards are in code > hunks that were back-patched bug fixes, which means that they are in areas > that are more likely than average to need additional fixing. Yes, that is very true. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
