On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2015-05-29 8:20 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info>: >> >> Le 29 mai 2015 8:10 AM, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> a écrit >> : >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > I am not sure if PGXN can substitute contrib - mainly due deployment - >> > It doesn't helps with MS Windows. Installing necessary software for >> > compilation there is terrible. >> > >> >> I agree it's hard to compile an extension on Windows, but that's already >> what we have. And I'm sure EDB will put all interesting contrib modules in >> their windows installer to help users. They already go way further than any >> Linux packages. > > I afraid so dependency on EDB in this case is wrong - I have respect to EDB > due work, but installation other extension from EDB stack is difficult, > unclean, and nothing what I would to use as new base.
The five or six mouse clicks required to install something like Slony or PostGIS (or both at once) is difficult and unclean? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
