On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Also ... if we were to rename it, it should be "pg_wal" or "pg_xact". > Please let's not add yet another term for the WAL.
+1 for pg_wal if it has to be renamed. If pg_clog also has to be renamed, how about using your other suggestion "pg_xact" for that? It fits alongside pg_multixact. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
