On 06/01/2015 04:22 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Also ... if we were to rename it, it should be "pg_wal" or "pg_xact". >> Please let's not add yet another term for the WAL. > > +1 for pg_wal if it has to be renamed. > > If pg_clog also has to be renamed, how about using your other > suggestion "pg_xact" for that? It fits alongside pg_multixact.
Yes, or pg_commit would work too (it's the "commit log"). However, choosing a new name is the easy part. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
