On 06/01/2015 03:22 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> 
> On 06/01/15 23:47, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 06/01/2015 02:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody else want to speak for or against back-patching the patch as
>>> posted?  I intentionally didn't push it in before today's releases,
>>> but I will push it later this week if there are not objections.
>>
>> I would like Mark Wong to test this on DBT3, if that's possible for him.
>>   I'm very worried about an unanticipated regression.
> 
> AFAIK Mark is busy with other stuff at the moment, but I can do the
> TPC-H (which DBT3 is equal to, IIRC).

Yeah, I just want something which has a chance of catching unanticipated
regression in queries which should be unaffected by the patch.


-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to