On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2015-06-04 12:57:42 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> + /* >> + * Do we need an emergency autovacuum? If we're not sure, assume yes. >> + */ >> + return !oldestOffsetKnown || >> + (nextOffset - oldestOffset > MULTIXACT_MEMBER_SAFE_THRESHOLD); > > I think without teaching autovac about those rules, this might just lead > to lots of autovac processes starting without knowing they should do > something? They know about autovacuum_multixact_freeze_age, but they > know neither about !oldestOffsetKnown nor, afaics, about pending offset > wraparounds?
You're right, but that's why the latest patch has changes in MultiXactMemberFreezeThreshold. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
