Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > First off, I'd like to ask everyone to CUT IT OUT WITH THE $^*&^@** FLAMING, > > ALREADY! People are *attacking* each other instead of disagreeing. > > Amen. This was first time 'round for the advocacy group, and it's not > surprising that there are some things they did wrong, or at least could > have done better. Can't we discuss the matter like a group of > reasonably friendly people? I think we all have the same end goals > in mind, so I don't see the need for unpleasantness.
Agreed. Here's a story: Myself and a few people wanted live animals for a manger scene on our church lawn for Christmas. Many thought it was a bad idea, but we went ahead anyway. It was a huge success, but then people complained we didn't have enough people on the lawn to greet the hundreds of visitors. Moral of the story: if you take risks, expect folks to complain. And, even if you succeed, others will complain you didn't anticipate the success. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
