Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Yeah, the case is pretty weird and I'm not really sure that the server > > ought to be expected to behave. But if this is actually the only part > > of the server that misbehaves because of sudden gigantic time jumps, I > > think it's fair to patch it. Here's a proposed patch. > > I think the parenthetical bit in the comment should read "plus any > fractional second, for simplicity". Also, maybe replace "300" by > a #define constant MAX_AUTOVAC_SLEEPTIME for readability?
Okay, done. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
