On 2015-06-17 18:10:42 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Yeah, the case is pretty weird and I'm not really sure that the server > ought to be expected to behave. But if this is actually the only part > of the server that misbehaves because of sudden gigantic time jumps, I > think it's fair to patch it. Here's a proposed patch.
We probably should go through the server and look at the various sleeps and make sure thy all have a upper limit. I doubt this is the only location without one. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
