On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2015-06-26 09:44:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> I don't mind committing patches for this kind of thing if it makes the >> Coverity reports easier to deal with, which I gather that it does. > > It takes about three seconds to mark it as ignored which will hide it > going forward.
So what? That doesn't help if someone *else* sets up a Coverity run on this code base, or if say Salesforce sets up such a run on their fork of the code base. It's much better to fix the problem at the root. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
