On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I agree that the correct handling of this particular case is to mark it > as not-a-bug. We have better things to do.
+1 -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
