On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can you put your suggestions here in the form of a patch to the release notes?
The attached patch generalizes from the 9.2 release note wording. I use the word "inlined" here too, even though commit 5ea86e6e6 did not do too much with inlining of C code (unlike the 9.2 stuff that went in a little after SortSupport itself). Seems better to be consistent with the earlier item, and it is still probably in some sense true, because the new SortSupport-wise inlined comparator probably benefits from inlining more than the historic scanKey-wise inlined comparator, due to the removal of indirection. As I'm fond of pointing out, inlining is mostly useful as an "enabling transformation" these days. -- Peter Geoghegan
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml index 4e2ea45..44a9d88 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml @@ -221,6 +221,15 @@ <listitem> <para> + Allow sorting to be performed by inlined, + non-<acronym>SQL</acronym>-callable comparison functions for + <command>CREATE INDEX</>, <command>REINDEX</>, and + <command>CLUSTER</> (Peter Geoghegan) + </para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para> Improve in-memory hash performance (Tomas Vondra, Robert Haas) </para> </listitem>
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers