On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Finally, while I'm raining on everyone's parade: the mechanism of > identifying synchronous replicas by setting the application_name on the > replica is confusing and error-prone; if we're building out synchronous > replication into a sophisticated system, we ought to think about > replacing it.
I assume that you do not refer to a new parameter in the connection string like node_name, no? Are you referring to an extension of START_REPLICATION in the replication protocol to pass an ID? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers