Hello, This has been registered in the next 2015-09 CF since majority are in favor of adding this multiple sync replication feature (with quorum/priority).
New patch will be submitted once we have reached a consensus on the design. -- Beena Emerson
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch failover WAS: Support for N sync... Fujii Masao
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch failover WAS: Support for N sync... Sawada Masahiko
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch failover WAS: Support for N sync... Fujii Masao
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch failover WAS: Support for N sync... Sawada Masahiko
- [HACKERS] Re: Synch failover WAS: Support for N sync... Beena Emerson
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch failover WAS: Support for N sync... Josh Berkus
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch failover WAS: Support for N sync... Andres Freund
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch failover WAS: Support for N sync... Michael Paquier
- Re: [HACKERS] Synch failover WAS: Support for N sync... Andres Freund
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby serv... Beena Emerson
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby serv... Beena Emerson
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby serv... Simon Riggs
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby serv... Sawada Masahiko
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby serv... Michael Paquier
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby serv... Simon Riggs
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby serv... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby serv... Michael Paquier
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby serv... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby servers -... Sawada Masahiko
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby serv... Michael Paquier
- Re: [HACKERS] Support for N synchronous standby servers -... Peter Eisentraut
