On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 13 May 2015 at 09:35, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > > >> In summary, the X^1.5 correction seems to work pretty well. It doesn't >> completely eliminate the problem, but it makes it a lot better. >> > > Agreed > Do we want to consider if wal_compression is enabled as that can reduce the effect full_page_writes? Also I am planning to run some tests for this patch, but not sure if tps and or latency numbers by pgbench are sufficient or do you people want to see actual read/write count via some form of dynamic tracing (stap) as done by the reporter of this issue? With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
