On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: >> ISTM that one our consensus is to make wal_compression SUSET >> as the first step whatever approach we adopt for the risk in question >> later. So, barring any objection, I will commit the attached patch >> and change the context to PGC_SUSET. > > That's surely a step in the good direction. Thanks.
Yep, pushed! Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
