On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Yourfriend <doudou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Suggestion: When a conflict was found for UPSERT, don't access the > sequence, so users can have a reasonable list of ID.
This is not technically feasible. What if the arbiter index is a serial PK? The same thing can happen when a transaction is aborted. SERIAL is not guaranteed to be gapless. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
