On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:59 +0530, Atri Sharma wrote: > > I think a heuristic would be more suited here and ignoring memory > consumption for internal types means that we are not making the memory > accounting useful for a set of usecases. > OK, I will drop this patch and proceed with the HashAgg patch, with a heuristic for internal types.
Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers