On 16 July 2015 at 05:07, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:59 +0530, Atri Sharma wrote: > > > > > I think a heuristic would be more suited here and ignoring memory > > consumption for internal types means that we are not making the memory > > accounting useful for a set of usecases. > > > OK, I will drop this patch and proceed with the HashAgg patch, with a > heuristic for internal types. > > Should we mark the patch as "returned with feedback" in the commitfest app then?
-- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
