Adam Brightwell wrote: > All, > > While looking at the include dependency graph for objectaddress.h: > > http://doxygen.postgresql.org/objectaddress_8h.html > > I saw that pg_list.h is both included and inherited (through multiple > paths) by objectaddress.h. Perhaps this doesn't matter, but I thought > I would at least bring it up and propose removing this redundant > #include from objectaddress.h.
I wondered whether to bother about this kind of thing for a while. It doesn't have any practical impact immediately, because obviously pg_list.h is still included indirectly by objectaddress.h (via lock.h in this case IIRC). If we made some restructuring that caused the other header not to include pg_list.h anymore, that would make objectaddress.h broken -- unless objectaddress.h itself no longer needed pg_list.h. We've had in previous rounds whole iterations on a "pgrminclude" script that does this kind of thing, but the breakage after each such run is large. All in all, I wouldn't bother unless there is an actual change. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
