> I wondered whether to bother about this kind of thing for a while. It > doesn't have any practical impact immediately, because obviously > pg_list.h is still included indirectly by objectaddress.h (via lock.h in > this case IIRC). If we made some restructuring that caused the other > header not to include pg_list.h anymore, that would make objectaddress.h > broken -- unless objectaddress.h itself no longer needed pg_list.h. > > We've had in previous rounds whole iterations on a "pgrminclude" script > that does this kind of thing, but the breakage after each such run is > large. > > All in all, I wouldn't bother unless there is an actual change.
Understood. Thanks. -Adam -- Adam Brightwell - adam.brightw...@crunchydatasolutions.com Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
