On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > A fresh audit found the attached problems new in 9.5[1]. Most are cosmetic > INT/UINT or field order corrections.
I was responsible for a couple of the cosmetic ones. Sorry about that. It occurs to me that we could do a little more to prevent this automatically. Couldn't we adopt AssertVariableIsOfType()/AssertVariableIsOfTypeMacro() to macros like READ_UINT_FIELD()? I'm surprised that this stuff was only ever used for logical decoding infrastructure so far. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
