* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote: > On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 11:31:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > That being the case, it would probably be a good idea to get them done > > before alpha2, as there may not be a good opportunity afterwards. > > Freedom to bump catversion after alpha2 will be barely-distinguishable from > freedom to do so now. I have planned to leave my usual comment period of a > few days, though skipping that would be rather innocuous in this case.
This is clearly necessary, of course, and I wouldn't be surprised if we
have another necessary bump post-alpha2, but at the same time, it'd
certainly be nice if we are able to put out alpha2 and then a beta1 in
the future without needing to do a bump.
In other words, +1 from me for going ahead and committing this for
alpha2, if possible.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
