On 2015-08-03 PM 09:24, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> OK, sure. But let's make sure postgres_fdw gets a server-level option >> to control this. >> >> > For postgres_fdw it's a boolean server-level option 'twophase_compliant' > (suggestions for name welcome). >
How about just 'twophase'? Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
