On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2015-08-03 PM 09:24, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> OK, sure. But let's make sure postgres_fdw gets a server-level option >>> to control this. >>> >>> >> For postgres_fdw it's a boolean server-level option 'twophase_compliant' >> (suggestions for name welcome). >> > > How about just 'twophase'?
How about two_phase_commit? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
