On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:16 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > I'm given to understand that this tight coupling is necessary for > performance. Are you saying that it could be unwound, or that testing > strategies mostly need to take it into account, or...?
I'm just saying that we shouldn't expect to find a magic bullet test framework that solves all these problems. Without restructuring code, which I don't think is really feasible, we won't be able to have good unit test coverage for most existing code. It might be more practical to start using such a new tool for new code only. Then the new code could be structured in ways that allow the environment to be mocked more easily and the results observed more easily. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
