On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>wrote: > On reflection I think that the tracking of activeSubid in my patch is > probably overkill if we're attacking it this way. We can just have > AtSubAbort_Portals fail any ACTIVE portal regardless of subxact level, > which is pretty analogous to what AtAbort_Portals has done for a long > time. >
Tracking the activated subxact looked neat from my side, that's more consistent with what is done when the portal is marked as ready, particularly with the new routine introduced. > Let me work on this and see if I can get to a simpler patch. > Oh, OK. Thanks! -- Michael
