On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > AFAICT from a quick look at its documentation, asciidoc can produce > either html or docbook output; so as soon as you want something other > than html output (in particular, PDF), you're back to relying on the > exact same creaky docbook toolchain we use now. Only with one extra > dependency in front of it. > > Personally I never look at anything but the HTML rendering, but I doubt > that dropping support for all other output formats would fly :-(
Just out of curiosity, really? I mean, I can't see that building a PDF of the documentation really has much value, and I don't know even what else we can build. Who in 2015 would use a PDF instead of HTML? (If there is somebody, that is fine. But I am curious who it is and why, because it seems to me like it would just be a nuisance.) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
